Amid today’s deadline with Skydance, the competition to acquire Paramount Global has taken a dramatic turn with the emergence of a new contender. Edgar Bronfman Jr., the heir to Seagram’s liquor fortune, has submitted a $4.3 billion bid to acquire National Amusements Inc. (NAI), the holding company that controls the majority of Paramount Global’s voting stock.
This late offer directly challenges the existing $8 billion merger agreement between Paramount and Skydance Media, led by David Ellison, heir to the Oracle empire.
Bronfman’s offer includes $2.4 billion in debt and equity to acquire NAI and an additional $1.5 billion earmarked for reducing Paramount’s mounting debt. This proposal also accounts for a $400 million breakup fee to end the Skydance deal, making it a serious contender in this high-stakes battle.
Battle of the Heirs: Bronfman, Ellison, Redstone
The Skydance deal, already accepted by Paramount, includes a $2.4 billion payment to NAI, a $6 billion investment in Paramount shares, and debt repayment. The deal is complex, involving a merger between Skydance and Paramount valued at $4.75 billion. However, it has not been universally well-received. Concerns have arisen regarding the potential dilution of Paramount’s current shareholders, particularly those holding non-Redstone shares, as the merger would only offer partial ownership in the newly formed entity.
In contrast, Bronfman’s proposal aims to avoid such dilution by not merging Skydance into Paramount, making it a more straightforward and potentially attractive option for shareholders. Bronfman frames his offer as superior, emphasizing that it aligns better with shareholder interests by focusing on reducing dilution and providing a more straightforward path forward for the troubled media giant. Under the terms of both deals, Shari Redstone, heir to Paramount Global, will get a sweetheart deal.
Strategic Concerns and Investor Backlash
The Skydance deal has sparked significant controversy among Paramount’s shareholders. Many prominent shareholders have filed a books and records request to gain more insight into the agreement, expressing concerns that it may prioritize Shari Redstone’s interests over those of minority shareholders.
Additionally, the Employees’ Retirement System of Rhode Island has sought a Delaware court’s intervention to compel Paramount to disclose documents related to its negotiations with Skydance. This request stems from fears that Redstone’s involvement may influence the board’s ability to secure the best possible deal for all shareholders.
Complicating matters further, a prominent Paramount investor has filed a proposed class-action lawsuit accusing Redstone and the Paramount board of breaching their fiduciary duties. The lawsuit alleges that the Skydance deal could result in $1.65 billion in damages to non-NAI Class B shareholders, adding another layer of complexity to an already contentious situation.
The Role of Bronfman’s Backers and Their Impact
Bronfman’s bid is backed by a motley group of investors, including producer Steven Paul, UK investment firm BC Partners, Fortress Investment Group, and other high-profile figures such as former child actor and cryptocurrency entrepreneur Brock Pierce and Kazakh businessman Nurali Aliyev. This group brings significant financial muscle but sparse entertainment experience, with commitments reportedly totaling around $5 billion.
Bronfman’s offer does not include a cash-out option for Paramount’s Class B nonvoting shareholders, unlike Skydance’s proposal, which allocates $4.5 billion to buy out some Class A and B shares. This aspect of Bronfman’s bid may cause some hesitation among insider shareholders like Redstone, who hope for a more immediate financial return. However, supporters of Bronfman’s proposal argue that its simplicity and lack of dilution make it a cleaner and more sustainable option for Paramount’s long-term health.
Get Instant Access to How Much Streamers Like Paramount+, Netflix, and Disney+ Pay to License Films and Shows.
Worldwide Film & Television Distribution Intelligence
Get unparalleled access to market intelligence reports that draw on financial data and insights from dozens of content distribution deals worldwide between key industry participants, including — Distributors, Producers, MPVDs, and Streaming Exhibitors.
Film and Series distribution rates and terms deriving from dozens of agreements for rights to transmit films and episodic television via PayTV and SVOD.
Choose flexible options for single-user PDF downloads.
Licensing Terms & Included Programs:
Pay-1 & SVOD Rate Cards for Motion Pictures and Series Exhibited Worldwide in Multiple Availability Windows
- Motion Pictures: Pay-1, First Run, Second Window Features, Recent Library Features (Tiers AAA,A,B,C), Library Features (Tiers AAA,A,B,C), Current and Premium Made-For-TV Films and Direct-To-Video Films, covering many license periods over the last decade
- Episodic TV: Current, Premium, Premium Catalog (1HR & 1/2HR), Catalog Series (1HR & 1/2HR), and Catalog Miniseries + Case Studies on Current Mega Hit, Catalog Mega Hit, and Premium Catalog, covering many licensing terms from 2012-2024
- Because most-favored-nation rates operate in practice, the rates and terms apply to a diverse range of content and distributors worldwide in multiple availability windows.
Paramount’s Strategic Shake-Up Amidst Uncertainty
While the bidding war rages on, Paramount is undergoing significant internal changes as part of a long-term strategic plan to stabilize the company. The company’s co-CEOs have initiated cost-cutting measures, including $500 million in savings, asset divestitures and sales, and exploring new partnerships, including Charter Communications.
The restructuring began with layoffs affecting 15% of Paramount’s U.S. workforce and the closure of Paramount Television Studios. Additionally, the company has engaged bankers to explore potential asset sales, with targets including Pluto TV, BET, VH1, and the Paramount lot. These moves are part of an effort to streamline operations and refocus the company’s strategy in an increasingly digital and competitive entertainment landscape.
Paramount’s Financial Turmoil: Soaring Losses, Layoffs, and Massive Impairment Charge
Amid a looming deadline to sell the once-storied studio, Paramount Global reported a staggering net loss of $5.4 billion in Q2 2024, primarily driven by a $5.98 billion impairment charge, a dramatic deterioration from the previous year.
FilmTake Away: Paramount’s Path Forward Remains Uncertain
As the August 21 deadline for rival bids ends today, Paramount Global’s future remains precarious. Bronfman’s late-stage bid introduces a new level of uncertainty. It offers a glimmer of hope for those dissatisfied with the Skydance deal but also complicates the decision-making process for Paramount’s board.
Whether Bronfman’s bid will prevail, leading to a strategic shift focused on debt reduction and shareholder value, or whether the Skydance merger will move forward, reshaping the media landscape, remains to be seen. What is clear is that Paramount faces a daunting task in navigating these turbulent times.
The company’s next steps will be crucial in determining its future in an increasingly evolving industry dominated by digital-first players. Paramount’s ability to adapt, innovate, and strategically align with the right partners will ultimately dictate its survival and success in the years to come.