As Wednesday’s deadline loomed, the already complex battle for control of Paramount took another twist. The investor group led by Bronfman made a desperate move to stay in the game by increasing its bid for National Amusements to $6 billion.
This last-minute attempt aims at outmaneuvering the existing $8 billion merger deal between Paramount and Skydance Media. In a surprise move, Paramount’s special board committee, overseeing this drawn-out sale process, decided to extend the go-shop period—exclusively for Bronfman—until September 5.
A Last-Minute Twist: Bronfman Boosts Bid to $6 Billion
Bronfman’s $6 billion bid, made moments before the midnight deadline on Wednesday, represents a substantial increase from his initial $4.3 billion offer on Monday. That offer already included a $400 million breakup fee due to Skydance if Paramount chooses his proposal.
Also, Bronfman’s new offer adds $1.7 billion to cash out some of Paramount’s shareholders, offering $24 per share for Class A stockholders and $16 per share for a smaller number of Class B shares. This structure sweetens the deal compared with Skydance’s plan to spend $4.5 billion to buy out Class A and B shares at $23 and $15, respectively.
Under both proposed deals, Shari Redstone would receive $2.4 billion for her controlling stake in Paramount through special Class A voting shares. Additionally, both proposals include a $1.5 billion injection into Paramount to help the company reduce its debt and shore up its finances.
Bronfman vs. Skydance: A Clash of Visions
The two offers differ significantly in structure. Skydance’s deal involves an actual merger, with Paramount acquiring Skydance in a $4.75 billion all-stock transaction. While this would create a larger company with enhanced content and technology capabilities, backed by Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison and RedBird Capital, it has raised concerns among shareholders about dilution and the high valuation placed on Skydance.
In contrast, Bronfman’s offer avoids a merger, which he argues is simpler and less dilutive, potentially offering a cleaner path forward for Paramount.
Considering Paramount’s deep-rooted structural issues and severe mismanagement, Skydance might be better off taking the $400 million breakup fee and directing its billionaire backers toward more promising ventures. A partnership with Sony Pictures could be a smart alternative, or Skydance could remain independent and continue building its brand.
If Skydance is genuinely set on acquiring Paramount, patience might be its best strategy. Waiting a few years for Redstone and Bronfman to further diminish the company could allow it to swoop in at a much lower price.
The Complex Path to a Merger: A Rocky Road for Paramount
Finding a buyer for Paramount has been anything but smooth. Redstone began exploring merger and acquisition options in 2023, driven by the challenges of funding a struggling streaming operation while managing a portfolio filled with floundering television and film assets. Paramount’s stock had plummeted to less than one-third of its value since the 2019 merger of Viacom and CBS, creating pressure to find a strategic solution.
Over the past nine months, several major players, including Warner Bros. Discovery’s David Zaslav, Barry Diller, and Sony Pictures, expressed interest in acquiring Paramount, only to withdraw as the process continued. Paramount’s dual-class structure, with Redstone controlling nearly 80% of Class A shares but only 10% of the company’s total equity, complicated negotiations and deterred potential buyers.
Skydance’s proposal emerged as the leading contender after several revisions and false starts. However, the path to a final agreement has been fraught with challenges. Bob Bakish, Paramount’s former CEO and once a favorite of Shari, was ousted in April after expressing concerns about the Skydance deal. She was repeating a familiar pattern under Sumner and Shari Redstone’s decade-long mismanagement of the once-storied studio.
Bakish’s abrupt departure marked a turning point, leading to the appointment of an interim “Office of the CEO,” consisting of three co-CEOs. This leadership team has since announced significant cutbacks, including $500 million in annual cost reductions and the layoff of 15% of Paramount’s U.S. workforce.
Get Instant Access to How Much Streamers Like Paramount+, Netflix, and Disney+ Pay to License Films and Shows.
Worldwide Film & Television Distribution Intelligence
Get unparalleled access to market intelligence reports that draw on financial data and insights from dozens of content distribution deals worldwide between key industry participants, including — Distributors, Producers, MPVDs, and Streaming Exhibitors.
Film and Series distribution rates and terms deriving from dozens of agreements for rights to transmit films and episodic television via PayTV and SVOD.
Choose flexible options for single-user PDF downloads.
Licensing Terms & Included Programs:
Pay-1 & SVOD Rate Cards for Motion Pictures and Series Exhibited Worldwide in Multiple Availability Windows
- Motion Pictures: Pay-1, First Run, Second Window Features, Recent Library Features (Tiers AAA,A,B,C), Library Features (Tiers AAA,A,B,C), Current and Premium Made-For-TV Films and Direct-To-Video Films, covering many license periods over the last decade
- Episodic TV: Current, Premium, Premium Catalog (1HR & 1/2HR), Catalog Series (1HR & 1/2HR), and Catalog Miniseries + Case Studies on Current Mega Hit, Catalog Mega Hit, and Premium Catalog, covering many licensing terms from 2012-2024
- Because most-favored-nation rates operate in practice, the rates and terms apply to a diverse range of content and distributors worldwide in multiple availability windows.
A Struggling Media Empire: The Broader Implications
The ongoing merger saga underscores Paramount’s challenges as it grapples with a rapidly changing media landscape. The company recently booked a $6 billion write-down on its cable networks, a stark acknowledgment of the impact of cord-cutting and shifting viewer habits.
Meanwhile, Paramount+ showed a slight profit in the most recent quarter, with full-year profitability targeted by 2025. However, the streaming service also lost 2.8 million subscribers due to the end of a “hard-bundle” deal in South Korea, highlighting the difficulties of building a global direct-to-consumer platform capable of competing with giants like Netflix.
Paramount has already hinted at a joint venture with one or more subscription video-on-demand (SVOD) platforms, which could help Paramount+ achieve scale, enhance long-term value, and boost profitability. The company already collaborates with NBCUniversal for SkyShowtime, a joint venture that operates in over a dozen European markets, demonstrating a path for such partnerships.
FilmTake Away: Paramount’s Uncertain Future
As the extended go-shop period approaches its new deadline on September 5, Paramount’s future remains uncertain. The battle between Bronfman and Skydance reflects deeper tensions within the media industry, where traditional conglomerates struggle to adapt to the digital age.
Bronfman’s revised bid offers a potential lifeline for those wary of the Skydance merger’s implications. However, it raises questions about the company’s long-term strategy and lack of vision for the future among a motley crew of obscure investors with sparse media experience.
The special board committee now faces a critical decision: whether to endorse Bronfman’s offer, which could lead to a more streamlined and shareholder-friendly outcome, or proceed with the Skydance merger, which promises a grander scale but comes with significant risks.
Whether through a successful acquisition, a strategic partnership, or a complete overhaul, Paramount’s next steps will be pivotal in determining its place in an increasingly competitive and unpredictable entertainment landscape.