- Disney and Warner Streaming Bundle Desperate Strategic Turn
- Despite Modest Profits, Streaming is Sinking the Studios
- Worldwide Film & Television Distribution Intelligence
- Winners and Losers of the Partnership
- Bundling Sports: A Small Step Back to Cable Television
- FilmTake Away: Strategic Reversal Amid Monumental Challenges
Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) recently announced a rare cross-studio streaming bundle in a strategic reversal to retain fleeing subscribers. This new offering will merge Disney+ and Hulu with Warner Bros.’ Max, which features a wide array of content from the studio along with its premium service, HBO.
This partnership aims to attract new viewers with a comprehensive entertainment package and reduce subscriber churn for both companies. It represents the latest step in transforming isolated streaming services into a modern version of cable television.
Disney and Warner Streaming Bundle Desperate Strategic Turn
The streaming wars have taken a dramatic turn, with content heavyweights WBD and Disney joining forces to create a streaming bundle that includes Max, Disney+, and Hulu. This surprising alliance between fierce rivals marks a dramatic shift in the streaming landscape, moving away from exclusive content silos to a broader licensing model.
While WBD promotes this partnership as a significant success, it also subtly highlights the failures of its previous strategies. It’s difficult to overstate the disastrous few years WBD has experienced under disjointed leadership. Boosting one of the most desirable film and television catalogs, the company has stumbled over every vital decision since AT&T acquired it in 2016.
First, Warner Bros. was the last major studio to enter the streaming scene, launching HBO Max in May 2020 before rebranding it as Max in May 2023; more on the rebranding below. Other major studios had been in the game for years:
- Hulu started in 2009.
- Paramount started operating CBS All Access in 2014.
- Disney+ debuted in 2019.
- Peacock launched a month before HBO Max in April 2020.
Next, amid widespread theater closures related to lockdowns, Warner Bros. dealt a heavy blow to the traditional theatrical model in 2021 by dumping its entire 17-film slate onto its struggling HBO Max streaming platform. These films were released simultaneously in limited theaters permitted to stay open.
Following several streaming missteps, Warner Bros. tossed aside one of the most recognizable brands of the last fifty years when it renamed HBO Max to simply Max. This decision will likely become a case study in marketing courses for decades, illustrating a notable failure in brand management.
The rebranding of HBO Max to Max was intended to expand its appeal beyond HBO’s niche, edgy content. However, inconsistent messaging and reduced kids and family content have resulted in only modest subscriber growth.
Currently, Max has around 100 million subscribers, with approximately 52 million in the US and Canada and 47 million internationally. However, since early 2023, Max has seen a decline in domestic subscribers nearly every quarter, dropping from its peak of 55 million in the first quarter of 2023.
Set for launch this summer in the US, pricing details and an exact launch date have not been announced, but the bundle will be offered as both an ad-supported and ad-free plan and available for purchase on any of the three streaming platform’s websites. Disney’s existing bundle, including Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+, costs $14.99 per month with ads and $24.99 without ads.
Despite Modest Profits, Streaming is Sinking the Studios
Disney reported a $47 million quarterly profit from its Hulu and Disney+ services, while WBD earned $103 million from its Max service in 2023. Disney’s CEO highlighted streaming as a key growth area and announced plans to slow down the production of Marvel content, focusing on quality over quantity. Disney will limit Marvel releases to about two TV series and two to three movies per year. This reversal is a notable decrease from the previous output of over four Marvel shows annually on Disney+ and the ten films released between July 2021 and November 2023.
In May, when Disney reported $22.08 billion in revenue in the three months ending March 30, shares fell 10%, its worst day since 2022. In one day, Disney lost $20 billion in market value, roughly equivalent to the total market capitalization of entertainment rival and HBO parent WBD.
Studio streaming services continue to face an uphill battle in reversing the billions lost since trying to catch up to Netflix after the streamer grew into the golem that the studios created.
Get Instant Access to How Much Streamers Like Max, Hulu, Disney+, and Netflix Pay to License Films and Shows Worldwide.
Worldwide Film & Television Distribution Intelligence
Get unparalleled access to market intelligence reports that draw on financial data and insights from dozens of content distribution deals worldwide between key industry participants, including — Distributors, Producers, MPVDs, and Streaming Exhibitors.
Film and Series distribution rates and terms deriving from dozens of agreements for rights to transmit films and episodic television via PayTV and SVOD.
Choose flexible options for single-user PDF downloads.
Licensing Terms & Included Programs:
Pay-1 & SVOD Rate Cards for Motion Pictures and Series Exhibited Worldwide in Multiple Availability Windows
- Motion Pictures: Pay-1, First Run, Second Window Features, Recent Library Features (Tiers AAA,A,B,C), Library Features (Tiers AAA,A,B,C), Current and Premium Made-For-TV Films and Direct-To-Video Films, covering many license periods over the last decade
- Episodic TV: Current, Premium, Premium Catalog (1HR & 1/2HR), Catalog Series (1HR & 1/2HR), and Catalog Miniseries + Case Studies on Current Mega Hit, Catalog Mega Hit, and Premium Catalog, covering many licensing terms from 2012-2024
- Because most-favored-nation rates operate in practice, the rates and terms apply to a diverse range of content and distributors worldwide in multiple availability windows.
Winners and Losers of the Partnership
The new bundle is expected to benefit WBD significantly more than Disney. According to several streaming consumer surveys, the bundle will likely drive Disney+ and Hulu users to Max rather than the reverse since over 50% of Max subscribers also use Disney+, and more than 60% use Hulu.
In contrast, only 30-40% of Disney+ and Hulu users subscribe to Max. Furthermore, only 7% of Disney+ and Hulu users had previously subscribed to Max, indicating a large untapped market for WBD within Disney+ subscribers.
The financial upside for WBD is substantial, as the bundle could attract a significant number of Disney+ and Hulu users.
This strategic partnership is a survival tactic in the face of declining revenues from traditional linear networks and mounting losses from streaming. Disney and WBD have reported modest direct-to-consumer profits, but the quest to make SVOD a consistently profitable business continues. The push for bundling clearly indicates legacy media’s efforts to recreate the lucrative cable model in the streaming era.
Bundling Sports: A Small Step Back to Cable Television
News of the WBD and Disney bundle came on the heels of a joint venture of ESPN (Walt Disney), WBD, and Fox Corp for the upcoming launch of their joint sports-streaming service, Venu Sports, slated for this fall.
Venu Sports will be accessible through a new app, with options to bundle with Disney+, Hulu, or Max. The venture is pending regulatory approval and the finalization of agreements among the companies. Fox expects the service to reach 5 million subscribers within its first five years, with a potential market size of 50 to 60 million viewers.
FilmTake Away: Strategic Reversal Amid Monumental Challenges
The WBD and Disney streaming bundle represents a strategic reversal aimed at stabilizing and growing their subscriber bases amid a challenging media environment.
These media giants hope to leverage their complementary strengths by combining forces to attract and retain more subscribers. They ultimately strive to transform streaming into a sustainable and profitable venture, no longer a way to compete against Netflix but to survive.