Last year was the first year in the previous four years that didn’t welcome a new subscription streaming service from Hollywood’s major players. The lack of a new streaming service did not stop the existing services from offering new ways to watch content through paid and free ad-supported options.
Paid ad-supported (AVOD) and free ad-supported (FAST) streaming services continue to be the fastest-growing segments in the market.
While ad-free subscription services (SVOD) contracted 1% quarter-on-quarter to 82% of U.S. households in the last quarter of 2022, AVOD grew by 1% to reach 28% of households, and FAST grew by 1% to reach 24% of households.
Streaming Services Race to the Bottom
The brand identity of Disney+, and especially Netflix, is predicated on providing premium subscription streaming with no advertising. However, with the introduction of ad-supported options at the end of last year, the two most prominent streamers are now embracing the very thing that sets them apart from the competition.
These new advertising plans will do little to attract new subscribers and merely capture existing subscribers that are downgrading from their premium offerings resulting in a net loss for both services. Furthermore, cancellations will increase this year as economic headwinds mount and savvy subscribers rotate from one service to another in a cost-saving dance.
Netflix cancellations last year were almost entirely related to costs. From July to September 2022, the top two reasons for subscribers canceling were to save money (39%) and unwillingness to pay its higher subscription fees (17%).
U.S. AVOD & FAST Streaming Services
Netflix’s New Advertising Tier is Off to a Shaky Start
Netflix pushed the launch of its advertising tier to beat Disney+ to the market by a month. Likewise, Netflix priced its ad-supported service at $6.99, again undercutting Disney+, which is priced at $7.99. However, these corporate maneuvers will have little impact on existing and prospective subscribers.
Netflix and Disney+ couldn’t have picked a worse time to enter the advertising space as ad-spending contracts, which was evidenced by Netflix’s failure to sell enough ads out of the gate.
Reports from the advertising world confirmed that Netflix’s new advertising tier failed to hit contractual viewership targets. Netflix permitted advertisers to reclaim funds for ads that had not run yet. The company seems pleased with the results since the enterprise was cooked up in less than seven months. According to insiders, Netflix delivered less than 80% of the expected viewership numbers to advertisers.
READ MORE: Streaming services are scrambling for new strategies to retain their existing subscribers in a highly crowded domestic market. The level of churn among premium streaming services like Netflix, HBO Max, and Disney+ has accelerated.
As institutional investors grow wary of streaming services that have been unable to deliver a profit after years of empty promises, many streaming executives are scrambling to cut costs and embrace new revenue strategies, namely advertising. A year ago, it would have been unthinkable that Netflix and Disney+ would reverse their position against advertising, but here we are.
Netflix’s advertising tier launched in early November in the U.S. for $6.99 per month, compared to $9.99 for its basic tier without ads. The company also offers a standard tier for $15.49 and a premium tier for $19.99, both of which allow more than one device and offer enhanced picture quality. Currently, Netflix plans to deliver between four and five minutes of ads per hour. However, due to licensing agreement restrictions, over 10% of its catalog, which includes its most prestigious titles, will not be available to its advertising subscribers.
Worldwide Film & Television Distribution Intelligence
Get unparalleled access to market intelligence reports that draw on financial data and insights from dozens of content distribution deals worldwide between key industry participants, including — Distributors, Producers, Broadcasters, MPVDs, Pay Television Providers, and Streaming Exhibitors.
Film and Series distribution rates and terms deriving from dozens of agreements for rights to transmit films and episodic television via PayTV and SVOD.
Choose flexible options for single-user PDF downloads.
Licensing Terms & Included Programs:
Pay-1 & SVOD Rate Cards for Motion Pictures and Series Exhibited Worldwide in Multiple Availability Windows
- Motion Pictures: Pay-1, First Run, Second Window Features, Recent Library Features (Tiers AAA,A,B,C), Library Features (Tiers AAA,A,B,C), Current and Premium Made-For-TV Films and Direct-To-Video Films, covering many license periods over the last decade
- Episodic TV: Current, Premium, Premium Catalog (1HR & 1/2HR), Catalog Series (1HR & 1/2HR), and Catalog Miniseries + Case Studies on Current Mega Hit, Catalog Mega Hit, and Premium Catalog, covering many licensing terms from 2012-2024
- Because most-favored-nation rates operate in practice, the rates and terms apply to a diverse range of content and distributors worldwide in multiple availability windows.
FilmTake Away: Pennywise Pound Foolish
Both Disney+ and Netflix have the same dilemma with their advertising tiers, namely subscribers that can afford an ad-free service are much more desirable to advertisers than those who are downgrading to an AVOD service. Furthermore, AVOD subscribers churn at a much higher rate than SVOD subscribers.
Analysts estimate that Netflix will boost domestic revenue by 22¢ per subscriber by 2025 through advertising. Although this is welcome news for the investors in the profit-challenged company, it will prove to be pennywise, pound foolish in the end.
The Window Is the Product: Why Streaming’s Next Battleground Is Access, Not Content
The dominance of social video platforms and the plateau of streaming growth signal a new phase in entertainment. Content alone is no longer a moat, as production becomes riskier and audiences more complicated to retain—especially as many content creators and executives prioritize agenda-driven programming over compelling storytelling.
Continue Reading The Window Is the Product: Why Streaming’s Next Battleground Is Access, Not Content
Inside Paramount’s Corporate Meltdown: Fraud Claims, Merger Mess, and Shareholder Fury
Paramount Global is ensnared in a corporate catastrophe marked by accusations of bid manipulation, political meddling, and growing shareholder unrest, exposing fundamental vulnerabilities under disastrous leadership. With regulatory approvals jeopardized by unexpected political entanglements and legal battles intensifying, the once-storied media giant faces serious credibility and governance questions.
Resurrecting Value: How Syndication is Powering a New Phase of Streaming Monetization
With subscriber growth slowing and content costs ballooning, studios and streamers alike are revisiting syndication, not as a relic of broadcast television but as a renewed source of value in an increasingly saturated market. Lending out original titles is quickly becoming a practical tool for monetization.
Who Will Own the Future of Filmed Entertainment? Inside the Great Media Power Grab
Traditional media powerhouses are fighting to maintain relevance amid digital disruption. In 2024, more than 50% of media M&A deals involved cross-sector acquisitions, reflecting a strategic pivot towards owning intellectual property (IP) that can be monetized across multiple platforms.
Continue Reading Who Will Own the Future of Filmed Entertainment? Inside the Great Media Power Grab